Curated by
ACT
This report from the Stanford History Education Group describes the conclusions of their work in field testing a set of assessments of civic online reasoning by young people from the middle school to the college level. Middle school students were asked to analyze home pages, high school students evaluated evidence, and college students examined claims on social media. Samples of each assessment, along with rubrics and sample student responses, are included for teachers to use. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.8, SL.9-10.2 eval & integrate sources, SL.11-12.2 Eval&Integrate sources
3 Views
4 Downloads
CCSS:
Adaptable
Additional Tags
analyzing argument, analyzing websites, claims on social media, delineate an argument, evaluate an argument, evaluating evidence, assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author's claims., ccss.ela-literacy.ccra.r.8, ccss.ela-literacy.ccra.r.8 delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, ccss.ela-literacy.rh.9-10.8, critical thinking skills, evaluating information: the cornerstone of civic online reasoning, evaluating information: the cornerstone of civic online reasoning ccss.ela-literacy.ccra.r.8, oh.ela-literacy.rh.9-10.8, sl.11-12.2 eval&integrate sources, sl.9-10.2 eval & integrate sources, stanford history education group, stanford university, stanford university: evaluating information: the cornerstone of civic online reasoning ccss.ela-literacy.ccra.r.8